Design Problem
Design a solution to improve the user experience of social networks

User Research, Paper Prototyping, High Fidelity Prototyping, User Testing

User Research
Online Survey
Survey Questions (112 recorded responses)
The survey included two important questions in addition to demographics and frequency of use questions:
1. Which types of posts evoke a positive emotional response in you?
2. Which types of posts evoke a negative emotional response in you?
The responses varied from politics, instances of bragging, complaining about evoking negative emotions to inspirational posts, satire and family posts being the top posts that elicit a positive emotional response.
At the time of the survey in Spring 2016, it was election time which might have been a reason for high negativity associated with politics. The next most negative emotion was related to bragging, fake, show-off, instances where people post on social media about their accomplishments, success.
We wanted the user to have a positive experience on our social media platform. Based on the research the platform will have to discourage instances of bragging and promote humor and satire.
We wanted to encourage people to post about bland moments, moments not about success or accomplishments. Most of our lives are spent doing mundane stuff. If people could be more cognizant about that, it will significantly affect their social media experience. Several ideas to accomplish this were explored:

1. Branding or marketing message of the platform: Hence the name InstaBland
2. "Not Bland" button to allow people to flag posts that detract from the core value of the platform
3. Expiration dates vs. Forever: We decided to let the posts expire after a while to reduce the adverse consequences of sharing posts in the later future

To increase the user engagement with the platform, we included a "Bland" button that lets people appreciate posts by other people. We also wanted to discourage posts that evoked negative emotional responses in the user. We decided to include a "Not Bland" button so that the network of users can self-correct what kinds of posts are being shared on the platform. This was a controversial design choice among our group and the users that we talked to. One viewpoint was that "Not Bland" option is too similar to a "dislike" button which can lead to cyberbullying and all the negative consequences of the dislike button. Although we realized that the reason people are so polarized about the "dislike" button is that "dislike" word has developed a strong negative identity over time. On the other hand the word "Not Bland" does not have an inherently negative connotation associated with it. In some instances "Not Bland" might be considered a positive comment.

We decided that the only way to determine if the "Not Bland" button would have a positive or negative result on users was to do usability testing. Since this feature cannot be tested in isolation with a single user or even a group of users, we decided that it could only be tested when the app had been released, and a significant number of users (somewhere around thousands of users) were using it.

Concept Exploration
Early Sketches

Poster of three different concepts (credits Michael Brescia and Boney Yeldho)

We explored multiple concepts. One of the ideas was to create a plug-in for existing social media networks that analyzes a user's post before posting and makes suggestions to reduce the negative emotional consequences on the people in their network. The idea was to create some guidelines and using natural language processing and image analysis to detect when these guidelines are being violated. We did not pursue this concept because making a set of guidelines was a difficult task and would require people (employees of the company) to think up of all the scenarios and write up all the rules that should be followed. This would be a gargantuan and complicated task because these guidelines will vary across cultures and geographical regions.

The other two concepts that we explored were similar except for the interaction of the user with the posts. One idea explored the tinder-like interaction of swiping posts up, left or right to respond with "Bland", "Not Bland" or "SupaBland" and the other concept was based more on using emojis, buttons for each of the emotion that the user wanted to convey.

We also explored the idea of showing posts near one's location instead of having "Friends". The idea behind this was to reduce the incentive that people get by posting about their successes as they know their friends are watching. If the audience of the platform changes from friends to anyone in the geographical vicinity, the motivation for sharing posts also changes. This concept was taken from the social media platform "Yik Yak".

We created a poster with all these three concepts to get feedback from our target audience. People were very positive about the idea of a different social media platform where they can post about the normal, bland moments of their lives. So we decided to go ahead with the second concept or the "Darth Vader Concept".

Paper Prototyping
Usability Testing - Paper Prototype
We created a paper prototype exploring all our ideas and took it to users. We got very rich feedback from the users about how to improve our designs. Usability problems identified:

1. Navigation inside the app: Lack of back buttons on screens
2. Feedback: Lack of feedback after important operations such as posting a photo, sharing on facebook
3. Conceptual Model: The users couldn't relate the number of points in their profile to the "Bland", "Not Bland", "SupaBland" responses by other users
4. Gamification: We realized that we hadn't put a lot of thought into the trophy system and how it will work

We were able to solve these problems after considerable brainstorming. Once these issues were resolved, we decided to go ahead by building a wireframe and an Interactive prototype.


Credits: Michael Brescia

Interactive Prototype

Created using (The screens for this prototype were created by Michael Brescia)

Usability Testing
We conducted usability testing with five users using the Interactive prototype. We explored different usability testing methods: Silent Observation and Think Aloud Method to get varied feedback. Problems identified during these sessions were:
1. Lack of onboarding: Since the user was using this complex app for the first time, there was a need for a tutorial to explain different parts of the app to the user. Although our app had good discoverability regarding features that could be identified by an existing social media user, we needed a way to introduce new users to the basic functionality of our app.
2. Comment functionality: The ability to comment on the posts was not readily discoverable by the user as the comment input text field was at the bottom of all the comments. The user had to scroll to the bottom of all the comments to make a new comment.
We took this feedback into account and created new screens to improve our final prototype.

Credits: Michael Brescia

Final Prototype
Back to Top